The Process-Based Model of Policing Revisited: Examining the Reciprocal Relationship Between Procedural Justice and Police Legitimacy

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Most research on the impact of procedural justice on police legitimacy has relied on cross-sectional data, with limited attention to potential reverse effects. This study examines the reciprocal relationship between procedural justice and police legitimacy (i.e. obligation to obey) over time using cross-lagged panel analysis of three waves of survey data (n = 617) collected largely from crime hot spots in Baltimore, Maryland. Findings showed little evidence that prior perceptions of procedural justice influenced subsequent obligation to obey. However, some evidence of the reverse effect emerged, although it was significant only from Wave 2 to Wave 3, with prior obligation to obey predicting later perceptions of procedural justice. The findings suggest that the widely reported robust effects of procedural justice on police legitimacy may stem from an overreliance on cross-sectional studies. This study highlights the need for a more nuanced understanding of the relationship between procedural justice and police legitimacy.

Original languageEnglish
JournalJustice Quarterly
DOIs
StateAccepted/In press - 2025

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2025 Academy of Criminal Justice Sciences.

Keywords

  • Procedural justice
  • cross-lagged panel analysis
  • obligation to obey
  • police legitimacy
  • reciprocal relationship

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The Process-Based Model of Policing Revisited: Examining the Reciprocal Relationship Between Procedural Justice and Police Legitimacy'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this