Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

The Pushes and Pulls of Close Relationships: Attachment Insecurities and Relational Ambivalence

  • Mario Mikulincer*
  • , Phillip R. Shaver
  • , Naama Bar-On
  • , Tsachi Ein-Dor
  • *Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

199 Scopus citations

Abstract

Attachment theorists have emphasized that attachment-anxious individuals are ambivalent in their relational tendencies, wishing to be close to their relationship partners but also fearing rejection. Here we report 6 studies examining the contribution of attachment anxiety and experimentally induced relational contexts (both positive and negative) to explicit and implicit manifestations of (a) attitudinal ambivalence toward a romantic partner and (b) motivational ambivalence with respect to the goals of relational closeness and distance. Attachment-anxious individuals exhibited strong attitudinal ambivalence toward a romantic partner, assessed by both explicit and implicit measures. They also exhibited strong motivational ambivalence regarding closeness (both explicit and implicit), and this motivational conflict was intensified in relational contexts that encouraged either approach or avoidance tendencies. Participants who scored relatively high on avoidant attachment proved to be implicitly ambivalent about distance issues but mainly in negative relational contexts. Several alternative interpretations of the results were considered and ruled out.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)450-468
Number of pages19
JournalJournal of Personality and Social Psychology
Volume98
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 2010
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • ambivalence
  • approach-avoidance motivations
  • attachment
  • close relationships
  • explicit and implicit measures

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The Pushes and Pulls of Close Relationships: Attachment Insecurities and Relational Ambivalence'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this