Abstract
This paper explores the redactional process behind the formation of the primeval history (Gen 1,1 – 11,26), supporting the two-source model, which views the text as a combination of Priestly and non-Priestly strands. It identifies two patterns of redactional intervention: notes bridging the seams between Priestly and non-Priestly material in Genesis 1–5 (with no interventions in 11,1–26) and more extensive interventions in Genesis 6–10, including harmonizing glosses and occasional omissions of non-Priestly material. Drawing on a recent analysis of major additions in the Samaritan Pentateuch (SP), the paper argues that the SP provides comparative evidence for a conservative-yet-interventive redactional approach that is also reflected in the formation of the primeval history. The paper further suggests that methods for revising texts written on scrolls influenced redactional decisions, offering a new perspective on the formation of the Pentateuch.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 477-498 |
| Number of pages | 22 |
| Journal | Biblica |
| Volume | 106 |
| Issue number | 4 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - 2025 |
| Externally published | Yes |
Bibliographical note
Publisher Copyright:© 2025 Peeters Publishers. All rights reserved.
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'THE REDACTION OF THE PRIMEVAL HISTORY: COMPARATIVE MODEL AND MATERIAL ASPECTS'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver