TY - JOUR
T1 - The role of the welfare state in supporting economic transitions following family bereavement
T2 - Comparing Britain and Israel
AU - Holler, Roni
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2018 John Wiley & Sons Ltd
PY - 2019/1
Y1 - 2019/1
N2 - Despite its centrality to the experience of death and grief, it is only in recent years that the economic burden following family bereavement has been recognized by social care professionals and scholars. Based on the realization that death and bereavement are grounded in social context, and assuming this economic burden is a multifaceted phenomenon, the present study compares the British and Israeli welfare systems in three policy settings: social security, funeral services, and bereavement leave. The findings suggest that while in both systems bereavement and especially widowhood is considered a deserving category, recent pressures for restructuring the British welfare state have been successful in shifting provision from the state to the market. The findings also show that in both cases, albeit to a lesser extent in Israel, current policy measures are not fully aligned with critical scholarship on bereavement and its financial consequences, nor with socio-economic and demographic trends. These disparities are addressed using the notion of disenfranchised grief and by emphasizing the pivotal, although often overlooked role of the welfare state in constituting it. Lastly, the differences between the two cases are discussed in terms of the powerful role of Judaism in shaping Israeli policy.
AB - Despite its centrality to the experience of death and grief, it is only in recent years that the economic burden following family bereavement has been recognized by social care professionals and scholars. Based on the realization that death and bereavement are grounded in social context, and assuming this economic burden is a multifaceted phenomenon, the present study compares the British and Israeli welfare systems in three policy settings: social security, funeral services, and bereavement leave. The findings suggest that while in both systems bereavement and especially widowhood is considered a deserving category, recent pressures for restructuring the British welfare state have been successful in shifting provision from the state to the market. The findings also show that in both cases, albeit to a lesser extent in Israel, current policy measures are not fully aligned with critical scholarship on bereavement and its financial consequences, nor with socio-economic and demographic trends. These disparities are addressed using the notion of disenfranchised grief and by emphasizing the pivotal, although often overlooked role of the welfare state in constituting it. Lastly, the differences between the two cases are discussed in terms of the powerful role of Judaism in shaping Israeli policy.
KW - Israeli welfare state
KW - bereavement policy
KW - grief
KW - religion
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85052810142
U2 - 10.1111/spol.12440
DO - 10.1111/spol.12440
M3 - ???researchoutput.researchoutputtypes.contributiontojournal.article???
AN - SCOPUS:85052810142
SN - 0144-5596
VL - 53
SP - 128
EP - 141
JO - Social Policy and Administration
JF - Social Policy and Administration
IS - 1
ER -