The role of workers' attitudes and parent and child wishes in child protection workers' assessments and recommendation regarding removal and reunification

Bilhah Arad-Davidzon*, Rami Benbenishty

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

111 Scopus citations

Abstract

The study examines how child protection workers risk assessments and recommendations on removal and reunification of children at risk are influenced by the child and mother wishes regarding removal and associated with the workers' own attitudes towards key issues in child protection - removal, reunification, duration of alternative care, and perceived quality of out of home placements. Two hundred child protection workers in Israel completed the 'Child Welfare Attitudes Questionnaire' and provided their risk assessments and recommendation regarding case vignettes presented by the authors. Cluster analyses identified two groups: a 'pro-removal' group and a more 'anti-removal' group. The former made higher risk assessments and recommended removal significantly more than the latter. Removal and reunification recommendations were not associated with the child's nor the mother's wishes. Workers in both groups tended not to recommend reunification after a year in out of home care, even if they initially were against removal.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)107-121
Number of pages15
JournalChildren and Youth Services Review
Volume30
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 2008

Keywords

  • Attitudes
  • Child protection workers
  • Children at risk
  • Recommendation
  • Removal
  • Reunification
  • Risk assessments

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The role of workers' attitudes and parent and child wishes in child protection workers' assessments and recommendation regarding removal and reunification'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this