TY - JOUR
T1 - The Routine Use of Intrapartum Ultrasound in Clinical Decision-Making during the Second Stage of Labor-Does It Have Any Impact on Delivery Outcomes?
AU - Barak, Oren
AU - Levy, Roni
AU - Flidel, Orna
AU - Zaks, Svetlana
AU - Gillor, Moshe
AU - Hagay, Zion
AU - Vaisbuch, Edi
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2017 S. Karger AG, Basel.
PY - 2018/1/1
Y1 - 2018/1/1
N2 - Background/Aims: The study aimed to assess whether the use of intrapartum transperineal ultrasound (US) can reduce the rate of failed vacuum extraction (VE). Methods: This is a retrospective cohort study including all women delivering at term with the diagnosis of protracted second stage of labor. The mode of delivery and rate of failed VE were compared between women who underwent a US examination prior to the decision on obstetrical interventions ("+US" group) and those in whom clinical decisions were based upon digital assessment only ("no-US" group). Results: The study included 635 women. Among the "no-US" group (536), there were 13 failed VE attempts (3.6%) vs. none in the "+US" group (99, p = 0.1). There was a significant difference between the groups regarding mode of delivery (p = 0.001), with a lower cesarean section (CS) rate (20.2 vs. 27.8%) among the "+US" group. Maternal age, body mass index, nulliparity, gestational age at delivery, and birth weight, as well as neonatal short-term outcome did not differ significantly between the 2 groups. Conclusions: We demonstrate that among women who had the addition of intrapartum US during the second stage of labor there was a trend toward a lower rate of failed VE (although not reaching statistical significance), with a lower rate of CS but not affecting neonatal outcome.
AB - Background/Aims: The study aimed to assess whether the use of intrapartum transperineal ultrasound (US) can reduce the rate of failed vacuum extraction (VE). Methods: This is a retrospective cohort study including all women delivering at term with the diagnosis of protracted second stage of labor. The mode of delivery and rate of failed VE were compared between women who underwent a US examination prior to the decision on obstetrical interventions ("+US" group) and those in whom clinical decisions were based upon digital assessment only ("no-US" group). Results: The study included 635 women. Among the "no-US" group (536), there were 13 failed VE attempts (3.6%) vs. none in the "+US" group (99, p = 0.1). There was a significant difference between the groups regarding mode of delivery (p = 0.001), with a lower cesarean section (CS) rate (20.2 vs. 27.8%) among the "+US" group. Maternal age, body mass index, nulliparity, gestational age at delivery, and birth weight, as well as neonatal short-term outcome did not differ significantly between the 2 groups. Conclusions: We demonstrate that among women who had the addition of intrapartum US during the second stage of labor there was a trend toward a lower rate of failed VE (although not reaching statistical significance), with a lower rate of CS but not affecting neonatal outcome.
KW - Cephalopelvic disproportion
KW - Failed vacuum extraction
KW - Fetal head station/position
KW - Instrumental delivery
KW - Prolonged second stage
KW - Transperineal ultrasound
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85013678005&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1159/000455847
DO - 10.1159/000455847
M3 - ???researchoutput.researchoutputtypes.contributiontojournal.article???
C2 - 28222431
AN - SCOPUS:85013678005
SN - 0378-7346
VL - 83
SP - 9
EP - 14
JO - Gynecologic and Obstetric Investigation
JF - Gynecologic and Obstetric Investigation
IS - 1
ER -