The spread of security communities: Communities of practice, self-restraint, and NATO's post-cold war transformation

Emanuel Adler*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

323 Scopus citations

Abstract

This article invokes a combination of analytical and normative arguments that highlight the leading role of practices in explaining the expansion of security communities. The analytical argument is that collective meanings, on which peaceful change is based, cognitively evolve - i.e. they are established in individuals' expectations and dispositions and they are institutionalized in practice - because of communities of practice. By that we mean like-minded groups of practitioners who are bound, both informally and contextually, by a shared interest in learning and applying a common practice. The normative argument is that security communities rest in part on the sharing of rational and moral expectations and dispositions of self-restraint. This thesis is illustrated by the example of the successful expansion of security-community identities from a core of North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) states to Central and Eastern European countries during the 1990s, which was facilitated by a 'cooperative-security' community of practice that, emerging from the Helsinki Process, endowed NATO with the practices necessary for the spread of self-restraint.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)195-230
Number of pages36
JournalEuropean Journal of International Relations
Volume14
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 2008
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Communities of practice
  • Cooperative security
  • NATO
  • Security communities
  • Self-restraint

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The spread of security communities: Communities of practice, self-restraint, and NATO's post-cold war transformation'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this