TY - JOUR
T1 - The Structure and Dynamics of Worry
T2 - Theory, Measurement, and Cross-National Replications
AU - Boehnke, Klaus
AU - Schwartz, Shalom
AU - Stromberg, Claudia
AU - Sagiv, Lilach
PY - 1998/10
Y1 - 1998/10
N2 - This article presents a comprehensive conceptualization of the structure of worry and the relation of worry to mental health and well-being. It is assumed that worries have two facets, namely, the object of a worry (e.g., self, close others, society, the world) and the domain of a worry (the field of life with which it is concerned). The object of a worry is presumed to be more important than its domain in determining the impact of worries on mental health. Only worries concerned with self and close others (micro worries) are expected to be related to poor mental health, whereas worries about society or the entire world (macro worries) are expected to be positively related to mental health. An instrument is introduced to study worries in accordance with the proposed structure. Its validity is tested by two confirmatory techniques (similarity structure analysis and confirmatory factor analysis) in samples from Israel, West Germany, and (the former) East Germany. Worry scores are also related to five mental health indicators. Results show that across samples micro and macro worries can validly be distinguished. Micro worries are strongly related to poor mental health, whereas macro worries are unrelated to mental health or relate marginally to positive well-being.
AB - This article presents a comprehensive conceptualization of the structure of worry and the relation of worry to mental health and well-being. It is assumed that worries have two facets, namely, the object of a worry (e.g., self, close others, society, the world) and the domain of a worry (the field of life with which it is concerned). The object of a worry is presumed to be more important than its domain in determining the impact of worries on mental health. Only worries concerned with self and close others (micro worries) are expected to be related to poor mental health, whereas worries about society or the entire world (macro worries) are expected to be positively related to mental health. An instrument is introduced to study worries in accordance with the proposed structure. Its validity is tested by two confirmatory techniques (similarity structure analysis and confirmatory factor analysis) in samples from Israel, West Germany, and (the former) East Germany. Worry scores are also related to five mental health indicators. Results show that across samples micro and macro worries can validly be distinguished. Micro worries are strongly related to poor mental health, whereas macro worries are unrelated to mental health or relate marginally to positive well-being.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0032185436&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1111/1467-6494.00031
DO - 10.1111/1467-6494.00031
M3 - ???researchoutput.researchoutputtypes.contributiontojournal.article???
C2 - 9802232
AN - SCOPUS:0032185436
SN - 0022-3506
VL - 66
SP - 745
EP - 782
JO - Journal of Personality
JF - Journal of Personality
IS - 5
ER -