Abstract
We give a general technique on how to produce counterexamples to Beth's definability (and weak definability) theorem. The method is then applied for various infinitary, cardinality quantifier logics and Δ-closure of such logics.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 193-213 |
| Number of pages | 21 |
| Journal | Israel Journal of Mathematics |
| Volume | 69 |
| Issue number | 2 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - Jun 1990 |
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'The theorems of Beth and craig in abstract model theory, III: Δ-logics and infinitary logics'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver