The two meanings of a homophone

Benny Shanon*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

2 Scopus citations

Abstract

Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02139 Ss were presented with sentences whose main noun was either a homophone or not. Following each sentence, Ss were presented with a single noun and they had to indicate whether it was relevant to the sentence or not. More specifically, irrelevant probes following sentences containing homophones were either irrelevant with respect to both interpretations of the homophone or irrelevant with respect to the present interpretation of the homophone but relevant with respect to its other interpretation. The data suggest that people compare the main noun and the probe, and that in doing so they compute both entries of the homophone noun. No effect was found due to a variation in the delay between the presentation of the sentence and the presentation of the probe.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)571-574
Number of pages4
JournalPerception and Psychophysics
Volume16
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - May 1974
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The two meanings of a homophone'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this