TY - JOUR
T1 - The use of echocardiography in the management of shock in critical care
T2 - a prospective, multi-centre, observational study
AU - the NEAT ECHO Collaborators
AU - Flower, Luke
AU - Waite, Alicia
AU - Boulton, Adam
AU - Peck, Marcus
AU - Akhtar, Waqas
AU - Boyle, Andrew J.
AU - Gudibande, Sandeep
AU - Ingram, Thomas E.
AU - Johnston, Brian
AU - Marsh, Sarah
AU - Miller, Ashley
AU - Nash, Amy
AU - Olusanya, Olusegun
AU - Parulekar, Prashant
AU - Wagstaff, Daniel
AU - Wilkinson, Jonathan
AU - Proudfoot, Alastair G.
AU - Munro, Alasdair
AU - Lynch, James
AU - Coleman, Ruth
AU - McGahan, Jonny
AU - Salah, Mohamed
AU - Palmer, Alex
AU - Ramasamy, Roshan
AU - Leckie, Todd
AU - Masani, Alisha
AU - Thorburn, Patrick
AU - Latham, Peter
AU - Choyce, Andrew
AU - Higgins, Daniel
AU - Kocierz, Laura
AU - Burtenshaw, Andrew
AU - Pearson, Stephen
AU - Mayer, Janos
AU - Ball, Daniel
AU - McAlindon, Michael
AU - Yates, Elliot
AU - Elsawy, Ahmed
AU - Alder, Oliver
AU - Turner, Daniel
AU - Bogus, Katrina
AU - Cheng, Jessica
AU - Duncan, Greg
AU - Kelly, Charlie
AU - Allan, Laurence
AU - Kataria, Ketan
AU - Dezan, Valentina
AU - Knowles, Tim
AU - Costa, Asya Veoloso
AU - George, Daniel
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2024.
PY - 2024/10
Y1 - 2024/10
N2 - Purpose: Echocardiography is recommended as a first-line tool in the assessment of patients with shock. The current provision of echocardiography in critical care is poorly defined. The aims of this work were to evaluate the utilisation of echocardiography in patients presenting to critical care with shock, its impact on decision making, and adherence to governance guidelines. Methods: We conducted a prospective, multi-centre, observational study in 178 critical care units across the United Kingdom (UK) and Crown Dependencies, led by the UK’s Trainee Research in Intensive Care Network. Consecutive adult patients (≥ 18 years) admitted with shock were followed up for 72 h to ascertain whether they received an echocardiogram, the nature of any scan performed, and its effect on critical treatment decision making. Results: 1015 patients with shock were included. An echocardiogram was performed on 545 (54%) patients within 72 h and 436 (43%) within 24 h of admission. Most scans were performed by the critical care team (n = 314, 58%). Echocardiography was reported to either reduce diagnostic uncertainty or change management in 291 (54%) cases. Patients with obstructive or cardiogenic shock had their management altered numerically more often by echocardiography (n = 15 [75%] and n = 100 [58%] respectively). Twenty-five percent of echocardiograms performed adhered to current national governance and image storage guidance. Conclusion: Use of echocardiography in the assessment of patients with shock remains heterogenous. When echocardiography is used, it improves diagnostic certainty or changes management in most patients. Future research should explore barriers to increasing use of echocardiography in assessing patients presenting with shock. Graphical abstract: (Figure presented.).
AB - Purpose: Echocardiography is recommended as a first-line tool in the assessment of patients with shock. The current provision of echocardiography in critical care is poorly defined. The aims of this work were to evaluate the utilisation of echocardiography in patients presenting to critical care with shock, its impact on decision making, and adherence to governance guidelines. Methods: We conducted a prospective, multi-centre, observational study in 178 critical care units across the United Kingdom (UK) and Crown Dependencies, led by the UK’s Trainee Research in Intensive Care Network. Consecutive adult patients (≥ 18 years) admitted with shock were followed up for 72 h to ascertain whether they received an echocardiogram, the nature of any scan performed, and its effect on critical treatment decision making. Results: 1015 patients with shock were included. An echocardiogram was performed on 545 (54%) patients within 72 h and 436 (43%) within 24 h of admission. Most scans were performed by the critical care team (n = 314, 58%). Echocardiography was reported to either reduce diagnostic uncertainty or change management in 291 (54%) cases. Patients with obstructive or cardiogenic shock had their management altered numerically more often by echocardiography (n = 15 [75%] and n = 100 [58%] respectively). Twenty-five percent of echocardiograms performed adhered to current national governance and image storage guidance. Conclusion: Use of echocardiography in the assessment of patients with shock remains heterogenous. When echocardiography is used, it improves diagnostic certainty or changes management in most patients. Future research should explore barriers to increasing use of echocardiography in assessing patients presenting with shock. Graphical abstract: (Figure presented.).
KW - Critical care
KW - Echocardiography
KW - Intensive care
KW - Shock
KW - Ultrasound
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85202505882&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s00134-024-07590-6
DO - 10.1007/s00134-024-07590-6
M3 - ???researchoutput.researchoutputtypes.contributiontojournal.article???
C2 - 39158704
AN - SCOPUS:85202505882
SN - 0342-4642
VL - 50
SP - 1668
EP - 1680
JO - Intensive Care Medicine
JF - Intensive Care Medicine
IS - 10
ER -