The Use of Trusts to Subvert the Law: An Analysis and Critique

Mark Bennett*, Adam Hofri-Winogradow

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

5 Scopus citations

Abstract

This article closes a gap in the theory of trust law by supplying a normative account of the use of trusts to avoid and subvert legal norms outside trust law. While the use of trusts to subvert other law has been a major function thereof since the Middle Ages, theorists of trust law have largely steered clear of this function. We evaluate the commonly proffered justifications for the use of trusts to subvert the law, finding that such justifications are not plausible in liberal legal systems, so that the subversive use of trusts should be curtailed. Common law legal systems attempt to curtail this use by anti-subversive norms, but these attempts are far from completely successful. To the extent existing anti-subversive norms cannot be perfected so as to prevent the subversive use of trusts, an approach restricting the available types of trusts may be preferable.

Original languageAmerican English
Pages (from-to)692-718
Number of pages27
JournalOxford Journal of Legal Studies
Volume41
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - 2021

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Keywords

  • avoidance
  • legal theory
  • subversion
  • trust law
  • trusts
  • trusts theory

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The Use of Trusts to Subvert the Law: An Analysis and Critique'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this