TY - JOUR
T1 - Theoretical analysis of mixing in liquid clouds - Part IV
T2 - DSD evolution and mixing diagrams
AU - Pinsky, Mark
AU - Khain, Alexander
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© Author(s) 2018.
PY - 2018/3/13
Y1 - 2018/3/13
N2 - Evolution of droplet size distribution (DSD) due to mixing between cloudy and dry volumes is investigated for different values of the cloud fraction and for different initial DSD shapes. The analysis is performed using a diffusion-evaporation model which describes time-dependent processes of turbulent diffusion and droplet evaporation within a mixing volume. Time evolution of the DSD characteristics such as droplet concentration, LWC and mean volume radii is analyzed. The mixing diagrams are plotted for the final mixing stages. It is shown that the difference between the mixing diagrams for homogeneous and inhomogeneous mixing is insignificant and decreases with an increase in the DSD width. The dependencies of the normalized cube of the mean volume radius on the cloud fraction were compared with those on normalized droplet concentration and found to be quite different. If the normalized droplet concentration is used, mixing diagrams do not show any significant dependence on relative humidity in the dry volume. The main conclusion of the study is that traditional mixing diagrams cannot serve as a reliable tool for analysis of mixing type.
AB - Evolution of droplet size distribution (DSD) due to mixing between cloudy and dry volumes is investigated for different values of the cloud fraction and for different initial DSD shapes. The analysis is performed using a diffusion-evaporation model which describes time-dependent processes of turbulent diffusion and droplet evaporation within a mixing volume. Time evolution of the DSD characteristics such as droplet concentration, LWC and mean volume radii is analyzed. The mixing diagrams are plotted for the final mixing stages. It is shown that the difference between the mixing diagrams for homogeneous and inhomogeneous mixing is insignificant and decreases with an increase in the DSD width. The dependencies of the normalized cube of the mean volume radius on the cloud fraction were compared with those on normalized droplet concentration and found to be quite different. If the normalized droplet concentration is used, mixing diagrams do not show any significant dependence on relative humidity in the dry volume. The main conclusion of the study is that traditional mixing diagrams cannot serve as a reliable tool for analysis of mixing type.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85043775652&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.5194/acp-18-3659-2018
DO - 10.5194/acp-18-3659-2018
M3 - ???researchoutput.researchoutputtypes.contributiontojournal.article???
AN - SCOPUS:85043775652
SN - 1680-7316
VL - 18
SP - 3659
EP - 3676
JO - Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics
JF - Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics
IS - 5
ER -