Theoretical notions of aromaticity and antiaromaticity: Phenalenyl ions versus fluorenyl ions

(Graph Presented) The dications 6, 7, and 8 and dianions 9, 10, and 11 of the bistricyclic aromatic enes bifluorenylidene (1), 1,1′- biphenalenylidene (2), and 9-(9H-fluoren-9-ylidene)-1H-phenalene (4), as well as monocations 12a and 13a and monoanions 14a and 15a of phenalene (3) and fluorene (5), were subjected to a systematic DFT and ab initio study. B3LYP and MP2 methods were employed to estimate the relative aromaticity/ antiaromaticity of these ions, using energetic, magnetic, and structural criteria. The couplings of monoions 12a-15a to give the respective diions 6-11 result in a similar destabilization in both the fluorene and phenalene series. The interactions between the C₁₃H₈ units in diions 6-11 are weak and are not expected to result in a significant loss of aromaticity/gain of antiaromaticity, as compared with the respective monoions. The antiaromaticity of bifluorenylidene dication (6), relative to that of two fluorenyl cations (12a), is only slightly enhanced as compared with the aromaticity of biphenalenylidene dication ((E)-7)) relative to that of two phenalenyl cations (13a). In particular, the homodesmotic reaction 6 + 2·13a = (E)-7 + 2·12a is only slightly exothermic, ΔE_Tot = -6.0 kJ/mol. The energetic effect of the analogous reaction involving anions 9 + 2·15a = (E)-10 + 2·14a is even smaller, ΔE_Tot = -3.4 kJ/mol. Bifluorenylidene dianion (9) and 1,1′;-biphenalenylidene dianion ((E)-10) are aromatic, but the employed criteria disagree about their relative aromaticity. The electronic and structural properties of heteromerous dication 8 and dianion 11 lie between those of the homomerous diions. Thus, dications 6-8 and dianions 9-11 form a continuum of aromaticity/antiaromaticity.