Thrill of victory or agony of defeat? Perceivers fail to utilize information in facial movements

Hillel Aviezer*, Shiri Zangvil, Daniel S. Messinger, Whitney I. Mattson, Devon N. Gangi, Alexander Todorov

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

23 Scopus citations

Abstract

Although the distinction between positive and negative facial expressions is assumed to be clear and robust, recent research with intense real-life faces has shown that viewers are unable to reliably differentiate the valence of such expressions (Aviezer, Trope, & Todorov, 2012). Yet, the fact that viewers fail to distinguish these expressions does not in itself testify that the faces are physically identical. In Experiment 1, the muscular activity of victorious and defeated faces was analyzed. Higher numbers of individually coded facial actions-particularly smiling and mouth opening-were more common among winners than losers, indicating an objective difference in facial activity. In Experiment 2, we asked whether supplying participants with valid or invalid information about objective facial activity and valence would alter their ratings. Notwithstanding these manipulations, valence ratings were virtually identical in all groups, and participants failed to differentiate between positive and negative faces. While objective differences between intense positive and negative faces are detectable, human viewers do not utilize these differences in determining valence. These results suggest a surprising dissociation between information present in expressions and information used by perceivers.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)791-797
Number of pages7
JournalEmotion
Volume15
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - 1 Dec 2015

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2015 American Psychological Association.

Keywords

  • Facial expressions
  • Facial valence
  • Intense emotions

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Thrill of victory or agony of defeat? Perceivers fail to utilize information in facial movements'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this