Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Time to rethink washout periods in inflammatory bowel disease clinical trials: an international Delphi consensus

  • Pauline Wils
  • , Vipul Jairath
  • , Bruce E. Sands
  • , Axel Dignass
  • , Fernando Magro
  • , David T. Rubin
  • , Iris Dotan
  • , Walter Reinisch
  • , Parambir Dulai
  • , Richard Gearry
  • , Christopher Ma
  • , Millie Long
  • , Alessandro Armuzzi
  • , Taku Kobayashi
  • , Dan Turner
  • , Sophie Vieujean
  • , Bram Verstockt
  • , Ailsa Hart
  • , Silvio Danese
  • , Laurent Peyrin-Biroulet*
  • *Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Background & Aims: Prolonged washout periods between advanced therapies and investigational drugs are commonly required in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) randomized controlled trials (RCTs). These requirements restrict patient enrollment and diverge from real-world clinical practice. This study aimed to establish an international expert consensus on washout durations for advanced therapies and conventional immunosuppressants (IS) in IBD clinical trials and to propose methodological recommendations for future study designs. Methods: An international panel of 12 IBD clinical trial experts participated in a Delphi consensus process. Agreement of ≥75% among participants was predefined as consensus. Results: A total of 12 statements were approved. Consensus was reached to eliminate washout periods for conventional IS (thiopurines, tacrolimus, methotrexate, and mycophenolate mofetil). For golimumab and ozanimod, experts agreed on a 2-week washout period. For other biologics (infliximab, adalimumab, vedolizumab, ustekinumab, and anti–IL-23 agents), most participants favored a 2–4-week washout duration and for JAK inhibitors and etrasimod, participants supported a short 2-week washout, though without reaching formal consensus. Experts recommended incorporating washout-based stratification (<4 vs ≥4 weeks) at randomization into future trial designs to evaluate its impact on safety, pharmacokinetics, and efficacy outcomes. Conclusions: This international Delphi consensus highlights the need to adapt current washout practices in IBD RCTs to real-world practice. Experts supported shorter and standardized washout durations—preferably less than 4 weeks—to better align with clinical practice, while maintaining patient safety. Acceptance of these recommendations by regulators could harmonize washout duration criteria, enhance recruitment efficiency, and accelerate patient access to innovative therapies without compromising safety.

Original languageEnglish
Article numberjjag060
JournalJournal of Crohn's and Colitis
Volume20
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 2024

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© The Author(s) 2026. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of European Crohn’s and Colitis Organisation. All rights reserved. For commercial re-use, please contact [email protected] for reprints and translation rights for reprints. All other permissions can be obtained through our RightsLink service via the Permissions link on the article page on our site—for further information please contact [email protected]. This article is published and distributed under the terms of the Oxford University Press, Standard Journals Publication Model (https://academic.oup.com/pages/standard-publication-reuse-rights)

Keywords

  • biologics
  • inflammatory bowel diseases
  • randomized trials
  • washout period

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Time to rethink washout periods in inflammatory bowel disease clinical trials: an international Delphi consensus'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this