Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Timing of cord clamping revisited

  • Tali Levy
  • , Isaac Blickstein*
  • *Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

36 Scopus citations

Abstract

Although cord cutting has been performed since the beginning of mankind, the timing and advantages of early versus delayed cord clamping are still controversial. Early cord clamping (within the first 30 s after birth) is usually justified for potential prevention of postpartum hemorrhage and for immediate treatment of the newborn, but at the same time, may increase Rh-sensitization. Delayed cord clamping is performed after a period of 30 s during which 'placental transfusion' of approximately 80 mL of blood occurs. This amount seems to protect the baby from childhood anemia without increasing hypervolemia-related risks. In preterm infants, delayed clamping appears to reduce the risk of intraventricular hemorrhage and the need for neonatal transfusion. Obtaining cord blood for future autologous transplantation of stem cells needs early clamping and seems to conflict with the infant's best interest. Although a tailored approach is required in the case of cord clamping, the balance of available data suggests that delayed cord clamping should be the method of choice.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)293-297
Number of pages5
JournalJournal of Perinatal Medicine
Volume34
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - 1 Aug 2006

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

Keywords

  • Cord blood banking
  • Intraventricular hemorrhage
  • Third stage of labor
  • Umbilical cord

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Timing of cord clamping revisited'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this