Title TBA: Revising the abstract submission process

C.B.U. Open Science Committee, Roni Tibon, Richard Henson, Aya Ben-Yakov

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

3 Scopus citations

Abstract

Academic conferences are among the most prolific scientific activities, yet the current abstract submission and review process has serious limitations. We propose a revised process that would address these limitations, achieve some of the aims of Open Science, and stimulate discussion throughout the entire lifecycle of the scientific work.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)271 – 274
Number of pages4
JournalTrends in Cognitive Sciences
Volume22
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - 2018

Bibliographical note

Funding Information:
R.T. is supported by a Newton International Fellowship by the Royal Society and the British Academy (grant SUAI/009/RG91715 ). R.H. is supported by a UK Medical Research Council grant ( SUAG/010/RG91365 ). CBU Open Science Committee members are: Andrea Greve, Aya Ben-Yakov, Dennis Norris, Joe Bathelt, Johan Carlin, Johannes Mehrer, Kevin Symonds, Nikolaus Kriegeskorte, Olaf Hauk, Richard Henson, Rogier Kievit, Roni Tibon, Rosemary Dunn, Russell Thompson, and Tom Manly.

Publisher Copyright:
© 2018 The Authors

Keywords

  • Open Science
  • academic conferences
  • preregistration

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Title TBA: Revising the abstract submission process'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this