Abstract
Seawater desalination is largely presented as a last resort to address water scarcity in closed basins. The question of whether seawater desalination can substitute for other costly measures, specifically large-scale diversion, has not been adequately assessed. To this end the full unit cost of supplying water to Beijing from the South-to-North Water Diversion Project, the largest in the world, is compared to desalination. Desalination appears to be much more cost-efficient than diversion, even when the diversion’s environmental externalities are excluded. By implementing desalination and water management options, China could substantially reduce water costs; this suggests that desalination should not be viewed only as a last resort.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 93-110 |
Number of pages | 18 |
Journal | International Journal of Water Resources Development |
Volume | 33 |
Issue number | 1 |
DOIs | |
State | Published - 2 Jan 2017 |
Bibliographical note
Publisher Copyright:© 2016 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.
Keywords
- China
- Seawater desalination
- inter-basin diversion
- supply cost
- water policy