Abstract
Seawater desalination is largely presented as a last resort to address water scarcity in closed basins. The question of whether seawater desalination can substitute for other costly measures, specifically large-scale diversion, has not been adequately assessed. To this end the full unit cost of supplying water to Beijing from the South-to-North Water Diversion Project, the largest in the world, is compared to desalination. Desalination appears to be much more cost-efficient than diversion, even when the diversion’s environmental externalities are excluded. By implementing desalination and water management options, China could substantially reduce water costs; this suggests that desalination should not be viewed only as a last resort.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 93-110 |
| Number of pages | 18 |
| Journal | International Journal of Water Resources Development |
| Volume | 33 |
| Issue number | 1 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - 2 Jan 2017 |
Bibliographical note
Publisher Copyright:© 2016 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 6 Clean Water and Sanitation
-
SDG 8 Decent Work and Economic Growth
Keywords
- China
- Seawater desalination
- inter-basin diversion
- supply cost
- water policy
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'To desalinate or divert? A comparative supply cost analysis for north coastal China'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver