Toward a Strong Phonological Theory of Visual Word Recognition: True Issues and False Trails

Ram Frost*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

604 Scopus citations

Abstract

A strong phonological theory of reading is proposed and discussed. The first claim of this article is that current debates on word recognition are often based on different axioms regarding the cognitive structures of the mental lexicon rather than conflicting empirical evidence. These axioms lead to different interpretations of the same data. It is argued that once the implicit axioms of competing theories in visual word recognition are explicated, a strong phonological model presents a viable and coherent approach. The assumptions underlying a strong phonological theory of reading are outlined, and 4 theoretical questions are examined: Is phonological recoding a mandatory phase of print processing? Is phonology necessary for lexical access? Is phonology necessary for accessing meaning? How can phonology be derived from orthographic structure? These issues are integrated into a general theory that is constrained by all of the findings.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)71-99
Number of pages29
JournalPsychological Bulletin
Volume123
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1998

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Toward a Strong Phonological Theory of Visual Word Recognition: True Issues and False Trails'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this