Abstract
Attention to the boundaries of an organization or profession is an essential precursor to facilitating boundary-spanning activities. We follow a four-stage process model of constructing boundaries to delimit a profession's membership and domain prior to its recognition as an institutionalized entity, A set of networking activities forms the basis of boundary construction, yet identifying and prioritizing which activities to pursue is a challenge that can jeopardize the success of an aspiring group. We use a case study of the emerging Jewish legal profession in pre-state Israel to analyze how an agenda for creating membership and domain boundaries implicitly surfaces through interactions among members of the new group. We employ content analysis of a key meeting transcript and network analytical methods to reveal a shared cognitive map of priorities. The study adds to the literature on professional boundaries and demonstrates the utility of an innovative qualitative-quantitative research approach.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 1167-1184 |
Number of pages | 18 |
Journal | Human Relations |
Volume | 58 |
Issue number | 9 |
DOIs | |
State | Published - Sep 2005 |
Keywords
- Agenda-setting
- Boundaries
- Centralises
- Network analysis
- Professions