TY - JOUR
T1 - Tracing Oligocene-Miocene source-to-sink systems in the deep Levant Basin
T2 - A sandstone provenance study
AU - Glazer, Adar
AU - Avigad, Dov
AU - Morag, Navot
AU - Gerdes, Axel
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2024 Geological Society of America. All Rights Reserved.
PY - 2024
Y1 - 2024
N2 - The Levant Basin in the Eastern Mediter-ranean contains an ~3-km-thick, predomi-nantly siliciclastic section of Oligocene-Mio-cene age, which hosts large hydrocarbon reservoirs (“Tamar Sands Play”). Here, we present a provenance study of Oligocene-Miocene sandstones based on detrital zircon U-Pb-Hf and heavy mineral assemblages. Samples were retrieved from four boreholes across the Levant Basin: Myra-1, Dolphin-1, Leviathan-1, and Karish North-1. Our in-vestigations revealed that the sediments are dominated by Neoproterozoic and older Precambrian zircons with variable Hf iso-topic composition, indicating that they were mainly reworked from Paleozoic-Mesozoic sandstones of African-Arabian provenance, with minor derivation from the Neoprotero-zoic basement of the Arabian-Nubian Shield. Variations in the proportions of pre-900 Ma zircons were encountered in various levels of the siliciclastic section. These zircons were markedly enriched (44%-57%) in the Rupe-lian and Aquitanian-Burdigalian intervals, accompanied by abundant detrital apatite peloids in the heavy mineral fraction, and relatively sparse (21%-38%) in the Chat-tian-Aquitanian and Langhian-Tortonian intervals, alongside scarce Mesozoic-Ceno-zoic zircons. These findings allow us to asso-ciate the deep-basin detrital record with two sedimentary transport systems that reached the Levant Basin from both NE Africa and Arabia simultaneously until the late Mio-cene, when sediment transport from Arabia ceased. While Rupelian and Aquitanian-Burdigalian sediments, including the main section of the “Tamar Sands,” were derived mainly from Arabian sources via the Levant continental margin, Chattian-Aquitanian and Langhian-Tortonian sediments were primarily sourced from NE Africa via the Nile Delta. Detrital contribution from the Eurasian side of the Eastern Mediterranean was not identified, suggesting that sand origi-nating in the Arabia-Eurasia collision belt did not reach the Levant Basin.
AB - The Levant Basin in the Eastern Mediter-ranean contains an ~3-km-thick, predomi-nantly siliciclastic section of Oligocene-Mio-cene age, which hosts large hydrocarbon reservoirs (“Tamar Sands Play”). Here, we present a provenance study of Oligocene-Miocene sandstones based on detrital zircon U-Pb-Hf and heavy mineral assemblages. Samples were retrieved from four boreholes across the Levant Basin: Myra-1, Dolphin-1, Leviathan-1, and Karish North-1. Our in-vestigations revealed that the sediments are dominated by Neoproterozoic and older Precambrian zircons with variable Hf iso-topic composition, indicating that they were mainly reworked from Paleozoic-Mesozoic sandstones of African-Arabian provenance, with minor derivation from the Neoprotero-zoic basement of the Arabian-Nubian Shield. Variations in the proportions of pre-900 Ma zircons were encountered in various levels of the siliciclastic section. These zircons were markedly enriched (44%-57%) in the Rupe-lian and Aquitanian-Burdigalian intervals, accompanied by abundant detrital apatite peloids in the heavy mineral fraction, and relatively sparse (21%-38%) in the Chat-tian-Aquitanian and Langhian-Tortonian intervals, alongside scarce Mesozoic-Ceno-zoic zircons. These findings allow us to asso-ciate the deep-basin detrital record with two sedimentary transport systems that reached the Levant Basin from both NE Africa and Arabia simultaneously until the late Mio-cene, when sediment transport from Arabia ceased. While Rupelian and Aquitanian-Burdigalian sediments, including the main section of the “Tamar Sands,” were derived mainly from Arabian sources via the Levant continental margin, Chattian-Aquitanian and Langhian-Tortonian sediments were primarily sourced from NE Africa via the Nile Delta. Detrital contribution from the Eurasian side of the Eastern Mediterranean was not identified, suggesting that sand origi-nating in the Arabia-Eurasia collision belt did not reach the Levant Basin.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85188027279&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1130/B36864.1
DO - 10.1130/B36864.1
M3 - ???researchoutput.researchoutputtypes.contributiontojournal.article???
AN - SCOPUS:85188027279
SN - 0016-7606
VL - 136
SP - 1587
EP - 1604
JO - Bulletin of the Geological Society of America
JF - Bulletin of the Geological Society of America
IS - 3-4
ER -