Trait as Default: Extraversion, Subjective Well-Being, and the Distinction Between Neutral and Positive Events

Michael D. Robinson*, Emily Crawford Solberg, Patrick T. Vargas, Maya Tamir

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

36 Scopus citations

Abstract

On the basis of prior work suggesting that trait self-knowledge serves a "fill-in" function when event-specific information is missing (M. D. Robinson & G. L. Clore, 2002a), we sought to demonstrate that extraversion is a more reliable predictor of subjective well-being (SWB) judgments among certain individuals than among others. Four studies involving a total of 260 participants revealed that the extraversion-SWB relation was relatively weaker among those quick to appreciate the distinction between neutral and positive events in a choice reaction-time task; by contrast, it was stronger among those slow to recognize this distinction. The findings suggest that extraversion scales measure (among other things) beliefs about SWB that differentially contribute to judgments among those less capable of making evaluative distinctions at encoding.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)517-527
Number of pages11
JournalJournal of Personality and Social Psychology
Volume85
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 2003

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Trait as Default: Extraversion, Subjective Well-Being, and the Distinction Between Neutral and Positive Events'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this