Transcurrent and transform faults: A problem of terminology

Z. Garfunkel*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

7 Scopus citations

Abstract

Transform faults do not differ in any fundamental manner from ordinary transcurrent faults. They all must terminate on structures in which surface area is increased or decreased. This is a direct consequence of the occurrence of strike-slips on these faults. The apparent differences between oceanic ridge-ridge faults and transcurrent faults on continents are the result of the former being embedded in oceanic crust which is younger than the faulting process. The two terms are, therefore, synonymous, and also equivalent to the broader term "strike-slip fault." Within this broad class of faults, distinctions may be made according to the magnitude of displacement, length of fault, size of blocks delimited by the faults, relations to other structures, and age relations between the faulting process and the rocks in which the fault, or fault segment, is embedded.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)3491-3496
Number of pages6
JournalBulletin of the Geological Society of America
Volume83
Issue number11
DOIs
StatePublished - 1972
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Transcurrent and transform faults: A problem of terminology'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this