Transmission control for schistosomiasis - why it matters now

Charles H. King*, Robert F. Sturrock, H. Curtis Kariuki, Joseph Hamburger

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

113 Scopus citations

Abstract

Current population-based schistosomiasis treatment programs are a first step to reducing the global burden of Schistosoma-related disease; however, they might not dramatically reduce parasite transmission in highly endemic areas. Consequently, the benefits of these programs remain in doubt because recurring low-level reinfection is likely to be associated with subtle but persistent morbidities such as anemia, undernutrition and diminished performance status. The real health benefits of transmission control need to be reconsidered and attention given to more aggressive and, ultimately, more affordable parasite elimination strategies. The next generation of schistosomiasis control can be optimized using new monitoring tools and effective transmission containment.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)575-582
Number of pages8
JournalTrends in Parasitology
Volume22
Issue number12
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 2006

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Transmission control for schistosomiasis - why it matters now'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this