TY - JOUR
T1 - Transoral robotic surgery
T2 - implementation as a tool in head and neck surgery – a single-centre Australian experience
AU - Hirshoren, Nir
AU - Ruskin, Olivia
AU - Fua, Tsien
AU - Kleid, Stephen
AU - Magarey, Matthew
AU - Dixon, Benjamin
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2016 Royal Australasian College of Surgeons
PY - 2018/11
Y1 - 2018/11
N2 - Background: Transoral robotic surgery (TORS) is now a well-validated technique for resection of head and neck cancers. Benefits include reduced patient morbidity, swallowing preservation and rationalization of adjuvant therapies. Methods: This was a single-centre, retrospective review of 35 patients who underwent TORS of oro-, retro- and parapharyngeal tumours between March 2014 and August 2015. Outcome measures included resection margins, swallowing function and impact on post-operative radiotherapy. Results: Median age was 63.7 years and the number of male patients was 22 (62.9%). Tongue base was the most common site (51.4%), followed by tonsil (25.7%). Nine patients (25.7%) had previous radiotherapy. A total of 24 patients had squamous cell carcinoma and the clear margin rate for primary TORS was 93.3%. Median hospital stay was 5.5 days, longer for previously irradiated patients (9 days). Median nasogastric tube dependence was 3.5 days. Four patients (11.4%) received a gastrostomy and two patients remained dependent on the tube at the time of last review. There were two major complications (5.7%): bleeding requiring return to theatre (1) and pulmonary embolism (1). Post-operative radiotherapy was either avoided or reduced in 22 patients (81.5%). Conclusion: TORS is a safe and effective tool, providing surgical access to oropharyngeal and other difficult to access areas. Patient selection and a multidisciplinary approach are essential to ensure adequate margins can be achieved and therefore to reduce adjuvant therapies.
AB - Background: Transoral robotic surgery (TORS) is now a well-validated technique for resection of head and neck cancers. Benefits include reduced patient morbidity, swallowing preservation and rationalization of adjuvant therapies. Methods: This was a single-centre, retrospective review of 35 patients who underwent TORS of oro-, retro- and parapharyngeal tumours between March 2014 and August 2015. Outcome measures included resection margins, swallowing function and impact on post-operative radiotherapy. Results: Median age was 63.7 years and the number of male patients was 22 (62.9%). Tongue base was the most common site (51.4%), followed by tonsil (25.7%). Nine patients (25.7%) had previous radiotherapy. A total of 24 patients had squamous cell carcinoma and the clear margin rate for primary TORS was 93.3%. Median hospital stay was 5.5 days, longer for previously irradiated patients (9 days). Median nasogastric tube dependence was 3.5 days. Four patients (11.4%) received a gastrostomy and two patients remained dependent on the tube at the time of last review. There were two major complications (5.7%): bleeding requiring return to theatre (1) and pulmonary embolism (1). Post-operative radiotherapy was either avoided or reduced in 22 patients (81.5%). Conclusion: TORS is a safe and effective tool, providing surgical access to oropharyngeal and other difficult to access areas. Patient selection and a multidisciplinary approach are essential to ensure adequate margins can be achieved and therefore to reduce adjuvant therapies.
KW - head and neck
KW - salvage
KW - squamous cell carcinoma
KW - transoral robotic surgery
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84995475669&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1111/ans.13801
DO - 10.1111/ans.13801
M3 - ???researchoutput.researchoutputtypes.contributiontojournal.systematicreview???
C2 - 27766718
AN - SCOPUS:84995475669
SN - 1445-1433
VL - 88
SP - 1129
EP - 1134
JO - ANZ Journal of Surgery
JF - ANZ Journal of Surgery
IS - 11
ER -