TY - JOUR
T1 - Troposphere-Stratosphere Coupling in Subseasonal-to-Seasonal Models and Its Importance for a Realistic Extratropical Response to the Madden-Julian Oscillation
AU - Schwartz, Chen
AU - Garfinkel, Chaim I.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
©2020. The Authors.
PY - 2020/5/27
Y1 - 2020/5/27
N2 - The representation of upward and downward stratosphere-troposphere coupling and its influence on the teleconnections of the Madden-Julian oscillation (MJO) to the European sector is examined in five subseasonal-to-seasonal models. We show that while the models simulate a realistic stratospheric response to transient anomalies in troposphere, they overestimate the downward coupling. The models with a better stratospheric resolution capture a more realistic stratospheric response to the MJO, particularly after the first week of the integration. However, in all models examined here the connection between the MJO and vortex variability is weaker than that observed. Finally, we focus on the MJO-SSW (sudden stratospheric warming) teleconnection and specifically initializations during the MJO phase with enhanced convection in the west/central pacific (i.e., 6 and 7) that preceded observed SSW. The integrations that simulated a SSW (as observed) can be distinguished from those that failed to simulate a SSW by the realism of the Pacific response to MJO 6/7, with only the simulations that successfully simulate a SSW capturing the North Pacific low. Furthermore, only the simulations that capture the SSW subsequently simulate a realistic surface response over the North Atlantic and Europe.
AB - The representation of upward and downward stratosphere-troposphere coupling and its influence on the teleconnections of the Madden-Julian oscillation (MJO) to the European sector is examined in five subseasonal-to-seasonal models. We show that while the models simulate a realistic stratospheric response to transient anomalies in troposphere, they overestimate the downward coupling. The models with a better stratospheric resolution capture a more realistic stratospheric response to the MJO, particularly after the first week of the integration. However, in all models examined here the connection between the MJO and vortex variability is weaker than that observed. Finally, we focus on the MJO-SSW (sudden stratospheric warming) teleconnection and specifically initializations during the MJO phase with enhanced convection in the west/central pacific (i.e., 6 and 7) that preceded observed SSW. The integrations that simulated a SSW (as observed) can be distinguished from those that failed to simulate a SSW by the realism of the Pacific response to MJO 6/7, with only the simulations that successfully simulate a SSW capturing the North Pacific low. Furthermore, only the simulations that capture the SSW subsequently simulate a realistic surface response over the North Atlantic and Europe.
KW - MJO
KW - S2S
KW - stratosphere
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85085317321&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1029/2019JD032043
DO - 10.1029/2019JD032043
M3 - ???researchoutput.researchoutputtypes.contributiontojournal.article???
AN - SCOPUS:85085317321
SN - 2169-897X
VL - 125
JO - Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres
JF - Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres
IS - 10
M1 - e2019JD032043
ER -