TY - JOUR
T1 - Types of administrative burden reduction strategies
T2 - who, what, and how
AU - Benish, Avishai
AU - Tarshish, Noam
AU - Holler, Roni
AU - Gal, John
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2023 The Author(s).
PY - 2024/7/1
Y1 - 2024/7/1
N2 - This article contributes to the growing body of research on administrative burdens by providing a theoretically and empirically driven typology of governments' burden reduction strategies. Despite the mounting interest in burden reduction, the literature still lacks a typology for systematically identifying and classifying such strategies. The article identifies three analytical dimensions of burden reduction: distributive (who bears the burden), intensiveness (what the level of burden is), and relational (how burden is experienced in bureaucratic encounters). Based on these dimensions, and drawing on a systematic analysis of the case of social security in Israel, we identify, define, and characterize seven distinct strategies of burden reduction: shifting, sharing, discarding, simplifying, expediting, communicating, and respecting. The article concludes with a discussion of these strategies, their applicability, practical implications, and directions for the research agenda on burden reduction.
AB - This article contributes to the growing body of research on administrative burdens by providing a theoretically and empirically driven typology of governments' burden reduction strategies. Despite the mounting interest in burden reduction, the literature still lacks a typology for systematically identifying and classifying such strategies. The article identifies three analytical dimensions of burden reduction: distributive (who bears the burden), intensiveness (what the level of burden is), and relational (how burden is experienced in bureaucratic encounters). Based on these dimensions, and drawing on a systematic analysis of the case of social security in Israel, we identify, define, and characterize seven distinct strategies of burden reduction: shifting, sharing, discarding, simplifying, expediting, communicating, and respecting. The article concludes with a discussion of these strategies, their applicability, practical implications, and directions for the research agenda on burden reduction.
KW - Israel
KW - administrative burden
KW - administrative burden reduction
KW - bureaucratic encounters
KW - social security
KW - take-up
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85190639968&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1093/jopart/muad028
DO - 10.1093/jopart/muad028
M3 - ???researchoutput.researchoutputtypes.contributiontojournal.article???
AN - SCOPUS:85190639968
SN - 1053-1858
VL - 34
SP - 349
EP - 358
JO - Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory
JF - Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory
IS - 3
ER -