Types of administrative burden reduction strategies: who, what, and how

Avishai Benish*, Noam Tarshish, Roni Holler, John Gal

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

3 Scopus citations

Abstract

This article contributes to the growing body of research on administrative burdens by providing a theoretically and empirically driven typology of governments' burden reduction strategies. Despite the mounting interest in burden reduction, the literature still lacks a typology for systematically identifying and classifying such strategies. The article identifies three analytical dimensions of burden reduction: distributive (who bears the burden), intensiveness (what the level of burden is), and relational (how burden is experienced in bureaucratic encounters). Based on these dimensions, and drawing on a systematic analysis of the case of social security in Israel, we identify, define, and characterize seven distinct strategies of burden reduction: shifting, sharing, discarding, simplifying, expediting, communicating, and respecting. The article concludes with a discussion of these strategies, their applicability, practical implications, and directions for the research agenda on burden reduction.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)349-358
Number of pages10
JournalJournal of Public Administration Research and Theory
Volume34
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - 1 Jul 2024

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2023 The Author(s).

Keywords

  • Israel
  • administrative burden
  • administrative burden reduction
  • bureaucratic encounters
  • social security
  • take-up

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Types of administrative burden reduction strategies: who, what, and how'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this