TY - JOUR
T1 - Types of dialogue
T2 - Echo, deaf, and dialectical
AU - Fishelov, David
PY - 2013
Y1 - 2013
N2 - In order to offer a typology of dialogue that captures the complex and multifaceted nature of dialogues, we should take into account two factors: (1) the basic kind of interaction between the two interlocutors; the wide variety of specific interactions can be grouped under three general headings: echo-dialogue, whereby one participant repeats what the other has said; dialogue-of-the-deaf, whereby the two participants neither listen to nor understand one another; and dialectical-dialogue, in which the two participants are able to listen to and understand one another, albeit representing different points of view or sentiments. (2) The second factor is the distinction between the outer and the inner level of dialogue. This distinction characterizes any semiotic phenomenon, and derives from the distinction between linguistic form and content. The article argues that there is no automatic correspondence between the kind of interaction that occurs on one level and that taking place on the other. By using only these two factors we gain a systematic and elegant typology of dialogues that enables us to offer nuanced descriptions of a wide range of dialogical interactions in literary texts, notably in drama - as illustrated in the article.
AB - In order to offer a typology of dialogue that captures the complex and multifaceted nature of dialogues, we should take into account two factors: (1) the basic kind of interaction between the two interlocutors; the wide variety of specific interactions can be grouped under three general headings: echo-dialogue, whereby one participant repeats what the other has said; dialogue-of-the-deaf, whereby the two participants neither listen to nor understand one another; and dialectical-dialogue, in which the two participants are able to listen to and understand one another, albeit representing different points of view or sentiments. (2) The second factor is the distinction between the outer and the inner level of dialogue. This distinction characterizes any semiotic phenomenon, and derives from the distinction between linguistic form and content. The article argues that there is no automatic correspondence between the kind of interaction that occurs on one level and that taking place on the other. By using only these two factors we gain a systematic and elegant typology of dialogues that enables us to offer nuanced descriptions of a wide range of dialogical interactions in literary texts, notably in drama - as illustrated in the article.
KW - Conversation
KW - Dialogue
KW - Drama
KW - Dramatic genres
KW - Represented dialogue
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84888609233&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1515/sem-2013-0033
DO - 10.1515/sem-2013-0033
M3 - ???researchoutput.researchoutputtypes.contributiontojournal.article???
AN - SCOPUS:84888609233
SN - 0037-1998
VL - 195
SP - 249
EP - 275
JO - Semiotica
JF - Semiotica
ER -