Understanding Classical Mechanics: A Dialogue with the Cartesian Theory of Motion

Igal Galili*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapterpeer-review

Abstract

We make an excursus to the history of mechanics and consider the set of laws of motion established by Rene Descartes in the seventeenth century, followed by his inferred rules of collisions of material bodies. This knowledge preceded the mechanics of Newton who was inspired by Descartes’ theory. Observing the history in retrospect, the laws of Descartes may be seen as including important ideas—the uniform rectilinear motion as a natural state and the concept of quantity of motion (momentum). Descartes stated conservation of momentum in interaction (collisions); however, because Descartes’ momentum was defined incorrectly, his account of collisions was incorrect, violating Galileo’s principle of relativity which implies rest-uniform motion equivalence. We analyze Descartes’ laws of motion and each of his rules for elastic collisions, revealing the specific logic of Descartes and show how the following scholars—Wallis, Wren, Huygens, and Newton—refined some and refuted other of his statements regarding the conservation of momentum. Finally, we compare the laws of motion obtained by Descartes with those of Newton. The critique of Descartes’ theory is both ontological and epistemological. It emphasizes the inappropriate neglecting of empirical verification in favor of principles postulated as certain and convincing.

Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationScience
Subtitle of host publicationPhilosophy, History and Education
PublisherSpringer Nature
Pages3-38
Number of pages36
DOIs
StatePublished - 2021

Publication series

NameScience: Philosophy, History and Education
ISSN (Print)2520-8594
ISSN (Electronic)2520-8608

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2021, Springer Nature Switzerland AG.

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Understanding Classical Mechanics: A Dialogue with the Cartesian Theory of Motion'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this