Understanding uncontrolled hypertension: is it the patient or the provider?

Adam J. Rose*, Dan R. Berlowitz, Michelle B. Orner, Nancy R. Kressin

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

47 Scopus citations


The relative contributions of adherence and treatment intensity to blood pressure (BP) control are not well understood. The authors studied patients with uncontrolled hypertension (N=410) from 3 primary care clinics in the Veterans Affairs (VA) medical system. A questionnaire was used to assess patient adherence to therapy, and VA system pharmacy fills were used to assess the intensity of the antihypertensive regimen. At baseline, an inadequate antihypertensive regimen was implicated as the most probable reason for uncontrolled BP in a majority of patients (72%), while nonadherence could only be implicated in 13%. In multivariate longitudinal analyses, patients who had an increase in their medical treatment during the study had lower final diastolic BP levels compared with the patients who did not (-3.70 mm Hg; P<.05). While patient adherence to therapy plays a role, vigorous clinical management by the clinician is a more important contributor to BP control.

Original languageAmerican English
Pages (from-to)937-943
Number of pages7
JournalJournal of Clinical Hypertension
Issue number12
StatePublished - Dec 2007
Externally publishedYes


Dive into the research topics of 'Understanding uncontrolled hypertension: is it the patient or the provider?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this