TY - JOUR
T1 - Unreliable protection
T2 - An experimental study of experts’ in bello proportionality decisions
AU - Statman, Daniel
AU - Sulitzeanu-Kenan, Raanan
AU - Mandel, Micha
AU - Skerker, Michael
AU - de Wijze, Steven
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© The Author(s), 2020. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of EJIL Ltd. All rights reserved.
PY - 2020/9/1
Y1 - 2020/9/1
N2 - The proportionality principle is an international humanitarian law requirement intended to constrain the use of military force in order to protect civilians in armed conflicts. This research experimentally assesses the reliability of its application by legal and moral experts (in 11 countries), by military officers (in two countries) and by laypeople. Reliability was evaluated according to three criteria: inter-expert convergence; sensitivity to relevant factors; and robustness – relative (lack of) susceptibility to biases. Unlike laypeople, experts and military officers performed well on the sensitivity criterion and manifested an appropriate understanding of the principle at the abstract level. However, both groups of experts failed to reach reasonable judgment convergence. These findings cast doubt on the reliability of the protection provided to civilians during warfare, even when warring parties attempt to abide by the proportionality principle.
AB - The proportionality principle is an international humanitarian law requirement intended to constrain the use of military force in order to protect civilians in armed conflicts. This research experimentally assesses the reliability of its application by legal and moral experts (in 11 countries), by military officers (in two countries) and by laypeople. Reliability was evaluated according to three criteria: inter-expert convergence; sensitivity to relevant factors; and robustness – relative (lack of) susceptibility to biases. Unlike laypeople, experts and military officers performed well on the sensitivity criterion and manifested an appropriate understanding of the principle at the abstract level. However, both groups of experts failed to reach reasonable judgment convergence. These findings cast doubt on the reliability of the protection provided to civilians during warfare, even when warring parties attempt to abide by the proportionality principle.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85095824191&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1093/ejil/chaa039
DO - 10.1093/ejil/chaa039
M3 - ???researchoutput.researchoutputtypes.contributiontojournal.article???
AN - SCOPUS:85095824191
SN - 0938-5428
VL - 31
SP - 429
EP - 453
JO - European Journal of International Law
JF - European Journal of International Law
IS - 2
ER -
