US Jews and Israel: Distancing, Yet One

Sergio DellaPergola*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapterpeer-review

Abstract

In the debate about whether distancing has occurred between American Jewry and Israel, the distancing side is more convincing than the non-distancing side. Unfortunately, much of the current debate focuses on samples of the more identified Jewish population thus ignoring the more marginal that are quite crucial in adjudicating the controversy. Age specific cross-sectional data from the broadly representative 2001 NJPS unequivocally show a blurring among the younger of the strong sense of interest, affective involvement, responsibility and caring that American Jewry historically displayed toward Israel and its needs. Much of this is related to broader trends such as intermarriage and diminished participation in Jewish organizations. However, as of 2001, the demonstrable persistence of similar patterns of Jewish identification in the US and in Israel provided powerful evidence to persisting coherence in contemporary symbolic and institutional perceptions over the opposite thesis of a Jewish identification stemming from the variable circumstances of local contexts. Jews in the US and in Israel were distancing from each other, but they still were part of one.

Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationStudies of Jews in Society
PublisherSpringer Nature
Pages37-45
Number of pages9
DOIs
StatePublished - 2024

Publication series

NameStudies of Jews in Society
Volume7
ISSN (Print)2524-4302
ISSN (Electronic)2524-4310

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2024.

Keywords

  • Age cohort differences
  • Coherent perceptions
  • Data biases
  • Distancing
  • Identificational maps
  • Jewish identification
  • Representative sources
  • US and Israel

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'US Jews and Israel: Distancing, Yet One'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this