Use of scanning electron microscopy to indicate the similarities and differences in pseudocereal and cereal proteins

Shela Gorinstein*, Elke Pawelzik, Efren Delgado-Licon, Kazutaka Yamamoto, Shoichi Kobayashi, Hajime Taniguchi, Ratiporn Haruenkit, Yong Seo Park, Soon Teck Jung, Jerzy Drzewiecki, Simon Trakhtenberg

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

22 Scopus citations

Abstract

Isolated and separated protein fractions from cereal and pseudocereal grains were analysed by sodium dodecyl sulphate polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis and scanning electron microscopy. Prolamin, the main storage protein in cereal such as maize, showed a difference in electrophoretic patterns and fine structure in comparison with those from amaranth and soybean. In contrast glutelins from amaranth, soybean and maize showed some similarity in the distribution of protein bands and in microstructure. Amaranth and soybean were closely similar in distribution of protein fractions and their microscopic structure. As an addition to chemical analyses, microscopy helped to understand and visualize structural changes and textural differences in protein fractions. Pseudocereals can be used as a nutritive substitute of some cereals in functional foods.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)183-189
Number of pages7
JournalInternational Journal of Food Science and Technology
Volume39
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 2004

Keywords

  • Electrophoretic separation
  • Isolated protein fractions
  • Main storage proteins
  • Nutritive substitution
  • Structural changes

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Use of scanning electron microscopy to indicate the similarities and differences in pseudocereal and cereal proteins'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this