User-generated accountability: Public participation in algorithmic governance on YouTube

C. J. Reynolds*, Blake Hallinan

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Despite opaque automated systems and few formal channels for participation, YouTubers navigate algorithmic governance on the platform through a strategy we call user-generated accountability: the generation of publicity via content creation to reveal failures, oversights, or harmful policies. Through an analysis of 250 videos, we identify common strategies, concerns, and targets of accountability. Creators primarily upload vlogs that acknowledge the platform’s positive aspects, even as they express concern with YouTube’s policies, automated enforcement systems, poor communication practices, and discrimination against certain creators or content. In publicizing critiques of platform operations, videos enroll creators and audiences as active stakeholders in platform governance that can coordinate actions to draw the company’s attention to matters of concern. We argue that user-generated accountability practices offer a productive starting point for understanding how platform governance disputes come to be and how systems might be shaped or rebuilt to better serve the needs of competing stakeholders.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)5107-5129
Number of pages23
JournalNew Media and Society
Volume26
Issue number9
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 2024

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© The Author(s) 2024.

Keywords

  • Accountability
  • algorithm audit
  • algorithmic governance
  • automation
  • digital culture
  • platform governance
  • publicity
  • signal boosting
  • user-generated content
  • YouTube

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'User-generated accountability: Public participation in algorithmic governance on YouTube'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this