Abstract
Despite opaque automated systems and few formal channels for participation, YouTubers navigate algorithmic governance on the platform through a strategy we call user-generated accountability: the generation of publicity via content creation to reveal failures, oversights, or harmful policies. Through an analysis of 250 videos, we identify common strategies, concerns, and targets of accountability. Creators primarily upload vlogs that acknowledge the platform’s positive aspects, even as they express concern with YouTube’s policies, automated enforcement systems, poor communication practices, and discrimination against certain creators or content. In publicizing critiques of platform operations, videos enroll creators and audiences as active stakeholders in platform governance that can coordinate actions to draw the company’s attention to matters of concern. We argue that user-generated accountability practices offer a productive starting point for understanding how platform governance disputes come to be and how systems might be shaped or rebuilt to better serve the needs of competing stakeholders.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 5107-5129 |
Number of pages | 23 |
Journal | New Media and Society |
Volume | 26 |
Issue number | 9 |
DOIs | |
State | Published - Sep 2024 |
Bibliographical note
Publisher Copyright:© The Author(s) 2024.
Keywords
- Accountability
- algorithm audit
- algorithmic governance
- automation
- digital culture
- platform governance
- publicity
- signal boosting
- user-generated content
- YouTube