Abstract
Since Becker (1971), a common argument against asymmetric norms that promote minority rights over those of the majority is that such policies reduce total welfare. While this may be the case, we show that there are simple environments where aggregate sum of individual utilities is actually maximized under asymmetric norms that favor minorities. We thus maintain that without information regarding individual utilities one cannot reject or promote segregation-related policies based on utilitarian arguments.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 367-380 |
| Number of pages | 14 |
| Journal | Social Choice and Welfare |
| Volume | 42 |
| Issue number | 2 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - Feb 2014 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 1 No Poverty
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Utilitarianism and discrimination'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver