TY - JOUR
T1 - Validity of self-assessment of skin reaction after smallpox vaccination
AU - Huerta, Michael
AU - Balicer, Ran D.
AU - Mimouni, Daniel
AU - Goldberg, Avi
AU - Furman, Moshe
AU - Klement, Eyal
AU - Hourvitz, Ariel
AU - Grotto, Itamar
PY - 2006
Y1 - 2006
N2 - Objective. Smallpox vaccinees should be evaluated for the presence of a major skin reaction ("take") one week after vaccination, but this could prove to be logistically infeasible in the context of an emergency mass-vaccination campaign. We validated a tool for self-evaluation of the vaccination site for presence of take. Methods. We conducted a prospective, double-blinded, paired-measurement validation study of 174 non-naive adult vaccinees and their physician evaluators. Subjects provided paired, blinded, independent assessments of take 7-9 days after vaccination. Results. Overall, vaccinees and evaluators agreed on 157 of 174 (90.2%) take assessments. Sensitivity of the tool was 99.1%, and specificity was 75%. The positive predictive value of self-assessment was 87.2% and the negative predictive value was 98%. Specificity of the tool and measures of agreement were significantly modified by age, education, and occupation. When adjusted for the expected take rate among a population including naive vaccinees, positive predictive value and overall agreement increased significantly. Conclusions. Self-assessment may be a feasible option for evaluation of take in the event of mass smallpox vaccination. The predictive values and overall agreement of the tool are satisfactory, and can be expected to increase when used in a largely naive population.
AB - Objective. Smallpox vaccinees should be evaluated for the presence of a major skin reaction ("take") one week after vaccination, but this could prove to be logistically infeasible in the context of an emergency mass-vaccination campaign. We validated a tool for self-evaluation of the vaccination site for presence of take. Methods. We conducted a prospective, double-blinded, paired-measurement validation study of 174 non-naive adult vaccinees and their physician evaluators. Subjects provided paired, blinded, independent assessments of take 7-9 days after vaccination. Results. Overall, vaccinees and evaluators agreed on 157 of 174 (90.2%) take assessments. Sensitivity of the tool was 99.1%, and specificity was 75%. The positive predictive value of self-assessment was 87.2% and the negative predictive value was 98%. Specificity of the tool and measures of agreement were significantly modified by age, education, and occupation. When adjusted for the expected take rate among a population including naive vaccinees, positive predictive value and overall agreement increased significantly. Conclusions. Self-assessment may be a feasible option for evaluation of take in the event of mass smallpox vaccination. The predictive values and overall agreement of the tool are satisfactory, and can be expected to increase when used in a largely naive population.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=32044455527&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1177/003335490612100110
DO - 10.1177/003335490612100110
M3 - ???researchoutput.researchoutputtypes.contributiontojournal.article???
C2 - 16416697
AN - SCOPUS:32044455527
SN - 0033-3549
VL - 121
SP - 45
EP - 50
JO - Public Health Reports
JF - Public Health Reports
IS - 1
ER -