Valuation and management of money-back guarantee options

Amir Heiman*, Bruce McWilliams, Jinhua Zhao, David Zilberman

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

59 Scopus citations


In this article, we model money-back guarantees (MBGs) as put options. This use of option theory provides retailers with a framework to optimize the price and the return option independently and under various market conditions. This separation of product price and option value enables retailers to offer an unbundled MBG policy, that is, to allow the customer to choose whether to purchase an MBG option with the product or to buy the product without the MBG but at a lower price. The option value of having an MBG is negatively correlated with the likelihood of product fit and with the opportunity to test the product before purchase, and positively correlated with price and contract duration. Simulation of our model reveals that when customers are highly heterogeneous in their product valuation and probability of need-fit, and if return costs are low, an unbundled MBG policy is optimal. When customers have high likelihood of fit or return costs are excessive, no MBG is the best policy. When customers have small variance in product valuation, but vary greatly in likelihood of product fit, the retailer may prefer to offer a bundled MBG contract, extracting consumer surplus by charging a price close to the valuation level.

Original languageAmerican English
Pages (from-to)193-205
Number of pages13
JournalJournal of Retailing
Issue number3
StatePublished - 2002


  • Consumer uncertainty
  • Money-back guarantee
  • Option value
  • Product fit
  • Return policy


Dive into the research topics of 'Valuation and management of money-back guarantee options'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this