TY - JOUR
T1 - Values and attitudes towards cultural diversity
T2 - Exploring alternative moderators of the value–attitude link
AU - Grigoryan, Lusine
AU - Schwartz, Shalom H.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© The Author(s) 2020.
PY - 2021/9
Y1 - 2021/9
N2 - We study relations of two value dimensions—self-enhancement versus self-transcendence and conservation versus openness to change—with attitudes to cultural diversity. We examine two potential moderators of the value–attitude link, the meaning and the level of cultural diversity. We operationalize the meaning as the perceived consequences of cultural diversity for attaining value-relevant goals. We hypothesize that the perceived consequences depend on a group’s status: majority versus minority and high versus low. We test these hypotheses on representative samples from 25 regions of Russia (N = 1,934). As hypothesized, the self-enhancement/self-transcendence link to attitude, though negative in all groups, was most negative in the low-status group. The conservation/openness link to attitude was negative for majority Russians, as in past research, but it was positive among minorities. Level of cultural diversity had no moderating effect. This study highlights the importance of group differences in the meaning of attitude objects for understanding attitude predictors.
AB - We study relations of two value dimensions—self-enhancement versus self-transcendence and conservation versus openness to change—with attitudes to cultural diversity. We examine two potential moderators of the value–attitude link, the meaning and the level of cultural diversity. We operationalize the meaning as the perceived consequences of cultural diversity for attaining value-relevant goals. We hypothesize that the perceived consequences depend on a group’s status: majority versus minority and high versus low. We test these hypotheses on representative samples from 25 regions of Russia (N = 1,934). As hypothesized, the self-enhancement/self-transcendence link to attitude, though negative in all groups, was most negative in the low-status group. The conservation/openness link to attitude was negative for majority Russians, as in past research, but it was positive among minorities. Level of cultural diversity had no moderating effect. This study highlights the importance of group differences in the meaning of attitude objects for understanding attitude predictors.
KW - cultural diversity
KW - moderators of value–attitude links
KW - values
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85086589161&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1177/1368430220929077
DO - 10.1177/1368430220929077
M3 - ???researchoutput.researchoutputtypes.contributiontojournal.article???
AN - SCOPUS:85086589161
SN - 1368-4302
VL - 24
SP - 966
EP - 981
JO - Group Processes and Intergroup Relations
JF - Group Processes and Intergroup Relations
IS - 6
ER -