Valuing Peace: The Effects of Financial Market Exposure on Votes and Political Attitudes

Saumitra Jha, Moses Shayo

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

11 Scopus citations


Can participation in financial markets lead individuals to reevaluate the costs of conflict, change their political attitudes, and even their votes? Prior to the 2015 Israeli elections, we randomly assigned Palestinian and Israeli financial assets to likely voters and incentivized them to actively trade for up to 7 weeks. No political messages or nonfinancial information were included. The treatment systematically shifted vote choices toward parties more supportive of the peace process. This effect is not due to a direct material incentive to vote a particular way. Rather, the treatment reduces opposition to concessions for peace and changes awareness of the broader economic risks of conflict. While participants who were assigned Palestinian assets are more likely to associate their assets' performance with peace, they are less engaged in the experiment. Combined with the superior performance of Israeli stocks during the study period, the ultimate effects of Israeli and Palestinian assets are similar.

Original languageAmerican English
Pages (from-to)1561-1588
Number of pages28
Issue number5
StatePublished - 1 Sep 2019

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2019 The Econometric Society


  • Conflict
  • field experiment
  • financial markets
  • peace
  • voting


Dive into the research topics of 'Valuing Peace: The Effects of Financial Market Exposure on Votes and Political Attitudes'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this