Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Washington's view of the Sino-Soviet split, 1961–63: From puzzled prudence to bold experimentation

  • Noam Kochavi*
  • *Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

5 Scopus citations

Abstract

The intelligence community figured importantly in the Kennedy administration's handling of the Sino-Soviet split. Moving in tandem with a hardening policy perception about the reality of the split, intelligence analysts gave confidence to administration officials as the latter sought to come to grips with momentous shifts in strategic international alignments. Three stages are discernible. While scoring a success in charting the Sino-Soviet rupture, Kennedy's intelligence advisers initially shied away from ascribing permanence to the rift. Divisions of opinion, bureaucratic caution, cognitive inertia, and Sherman Kent's orthodox views about the advisory role of intelligence combined to produce this reticence. During 1962, the advent of China watchers to government contributed to greater conviction that the split was irreversible. The Sino-Indian Border War and the Cuban Missile Crisis culminated official Washington's tendency to both view the split a fait accompli and regard Moscow as less menacing than Beijing. A key figure in shaping this approach was Ray Cline, the CIA's Deputy Director for Intelligence.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)50-79
Number of pages30
JournalIntelligence and National Security
Volume15
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 2000

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Washington's view of the Sino-Soviet split, 1961–63: From puzzled prudence to bold experimentation'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this