Water allocation under distribution losses: Comparing alternative institutions

Ujjayant Chakravorty*, Eithan Hochman, Chieko Umetsu, David Zilberman

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

19 Scopus citations

Abstract

The distribution of water resources is characterized by increasing returns to scale. Distribution links water generation to its end-use. Standard economic analysis overlooks the interaction among these micro-markets - generation, distribution and end-use. We compare water allocation when there is market power in each micro-market. These outcomes are compared with benchmark cases - social planning and a competitive business-as-usual regime. Simulations suggest that institutions with market power in generation and end-use generate significantly higher welfare than the distribution monopoly and the competitive regime. However, if the policy goal is to maximize the size of the grid, a distribution monopoly is preferred.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)463-476
Number of pages14
JournalJournal of Economic Dynamics and Control
Volume33
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 2009

Keywords

  • Infrastructure
  • Market power
  • Spatial models
  • Vertical integration
  • Water markets

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Water allocation under distribution losses: Comparing alternative institutions'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this