Abstract
The distribution of water resources is characterized by increasing returns to scale. Distribution links water generation to its end-use. Standard economic analysis overlooks the interaction among these micro-markets - generation, distribution and end-use. We compare water allocation when there is market power in each micro-market. These outcomes are compared with benchmark cases - social planning and a competitive business-as-usual regime. Simulations suggest that institutions with market power in generation and end-use generate significantly higher welfare than the distribution monopoly and the competitive regime. However, if the policy goal is to maximize the size of the grid, a distribution monopoly is preferred.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 463-476 |
| Number of pages | 14 |
| Journal | Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control |
| Volume | 33 |
| Issue number | 2 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - Feb 2009 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 6 Clean Water and Sanitation
Keywords
- Infrastructure
- Market power
- Spatial models
- Vertical integration
- Water markets
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Water allocation under distribution losses: Comparing alternative institutions'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver