TY - JOUR
T1 - ‘Way Too White’
T2 - Navigating Our Colonial Legacies Through Critical Discussions on Positionality and Power Dynamics With Palestinian Feminist Scholars
AU - Cavazzoni, Federica
AU - Veronese, Guido
AU - Nofal, Mona Ameen
AU - Sousa, Cindy
AU - Fincham, Kathleen
AU - Shalhoub-Kevorkian, Nadera
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2025, PsychOpen. All rights reserved.
PY - 2025
Y1 - 2025
N2 - Particularly in recent years, interest in decolonizing knowledge production is increasing considerably. Debates have raised within various academic disciplines on the role of the researcher's positionality in the research and knowledge production process. Reflexivity and positionality have become keywords within feminist and anti-oppressive research, forcing scholars to confront a critical analysis of how knowledge is shaped and influenced by their positionality (in terms of race, class, gender, sexuality and other axes of social difference). Yet, there still strongly prevails the dominance of knowledge production by Western countries, which often maintain racialized representations of the populations of the rest of the world with them. Hence, in the present exploratory study we focused on practices of reflexivity during the research process as fundamental steps to support efforts to decolonize knowledge through examining researchers’ positionality, power and privilege in relation to their research settings, contents and participants. Through 21 research-discussion with feminist activists and researchers who had experience with cross-cultural and anti-oppressive research and anti-oppressive research methodologies, we delved into a reflective research process. The present study offers critical and methodological insights on how to protect one's research, and research process, from turning into relations of oppression, domination or control, especially when doing fieldwork in a cross-cultural setting.
AB - Particularly in recent years, interest in decolonizing knowledge production is increasing considerably. Debates have raised within various academic disciplines on the role of the researcher's positionality in the research and knowledge production process. Reflexivity and positionality have become keywords within feminist and anti-oppressive research, forcing scholars to confront a critical analysis of how knowledge is shaped and influenced by their positionality (in terms of race, class, gender, sexuality and other axes of social difference). Yet, there still strongly prevails the dominance of knowledge production by Western countries, which often maintain racialized representations of the populations of the rest of the world with them. Hence, in the present exploratory study we focused on practices of reflexivity during the research process as fundamental steps to support efforts to decolonize knowledge through examining researchers’ positionality, power and privilege in relation to their research settings, contents and participants. Through 21 research-discussion with feminist activists and researchers who had experience with cross-cultural and anti-oppressive research and anti-oppressive research methodologies, we delved into a reflective research process. The present study offers critical and methodological insights on how to protect one's research, and research process, from turning into relations of oppression, domination or control, especially when doing fieldwork in a cross-cultural setting.
KW - anti-oppressive research
KW - decoloniality
KW - feminist methodology
KW - positioning
KW - reflexivity
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85218734903&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.5964/jspp.15113
DO - 10.5964/jspp.15113
M3 - ???researchoutput.researchoutputtypes.contributiontojournal.article???
AN - SCOPUS:85218734903
SN - 2195-3325
VL - 13
SP - 5
EP - 20
JO - Journal of Social and Political Psychology
JF - Journal of Social and Political Psychology
IS - 1
ER -