TY - JOUR
T1 - Weak mitochondrial targeting sequence determines tissue-specific subcellular localization of glutamine synthetase in liver and brain cells
AU - Matthews, Gideon D.
AU - Gur, Noa
AU - Koopman, Werner J.H.
AU - Pines, Ophry
AU - Vardimon, Lily
PY - 2010/2/1
Y1 - 2010/2/1
N2 - Evolution of the uricotelic system for ammonia detoxification required a mechanism for tissue-specific subcellular localization of glutamine synthetase (GS). In uricotelic vertebrates, GS is mitochondrial in liver cells and cytoplasmic in brain. Because these species contain a single copy of the GS gene, it is not clear how tissue-specific subcellular localization is achieved. Here we show that in chicken, which utilizes the uricotelic system, the GS transcripts of liver and brain cells are identical and, consistently, there is no difference in the amino acid sequence of the protein. The N-terminus of GS, which constitutes a 'weak' mitochondrial targeting signal (MTS), is sufficient to direct a chimeric protein to the mitochondria in hepatocytes and to the cytoplasm in astrocytes. Considering that a weak MTS is dependent on a highly negative mitochondrial membrane potential (ΔΨ) for import, we examined the magnitude of ΔΨ in hepatocytes and astrocytes. Our results unexpectedly revealed that ΔΨ in hepatocytes is considerably more negative than that of astrocytes and that converting the targeting signal into 'strong' MTS abolished the capability to confer tissue-specific subcellular localization. We suggest that evolutional selection of weak MTS provided a tool for differential targeting of an identical protein by taking advantage of tissue-specific differences in ΔΨ.
AB - Evolution of the uricotelic system for ammonia detoxification required a mechanism for tissue-specific subcellular localization of glutamine synthetase (GS). In uricotelic vertebrates, GS is mitochondrial in liver cells and cytoplasmic in brain. Because these species contain a single copy of the GS gene, it is not clear how tissue-specific subcellular localization is achieved. Here we show that in chicken, which utilizes the uricotelic system, the GS transcripts of liver and brain cells are identical and, consistently, there is no difference in the amino acid sequence of the protein. The N-terminus of GS, which constitutes a 'weak' mitochondrial targeting signal (MTS), is sufficient to direct a chimeric protein to the mitochondria in hepatocytes and to the cytoplasm in astrocytes. Considering that a weak MTS is dependent on a highly negative mitochondrial membrane potential (ΔΨ) for import, we examined the magnitude of ΔΨ in hepatocytes and astrocytes. Our results unexpectedly revealed that ΔΨ in hepatocytes is considerably more negative than that of astrocytes and that converting the targeting signal into 'strong' MTS abolished the capability to confer tissue-specific subcellular localization. We suggest that evolutional selection of weak MTS provided a tool for differential targeting of an identical protein by taking advantage of tissue-specific differences in ΔΨ.
KW - Astrocytes
KW - Glutamine synthetase
KW - Hepatocytes
KW - MTS
KW - Mitochondrial membrane potential
KW - Mitochondrial targeting signal
KW - Uricotelic vertebrates
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=76649117422&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1242/jcs.060749
DO - 10.1242/jcs.060749
M3 - ???researchoutput.researchoutputtypes.contributiontojournal.article???
C2 - 20053634
AN - SCOPUS:76649117422
SN - 0021-9533
VL - 123
SP - 351
EP - 359
JO - Journal of Cell Science
JF - Journal of Cell Science
IS - 3
ER -