What do Happiness Data Mean? Theory and Survey Evidence

Daniel J. Benjamin, Jakina Debnam Guzman, Marc Fleurbaey, Ori Heffetz, Miles Kimball

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

What utility notion - e.g. flow/lifetime, self/family-centered - do self-reported well-being (SWB) questions measure? Existing applications make different assumptions regarding the (i) life domains, (ii) time horizons, and (iii) other-regarding preferences captured by SWB data. To obtain relevant evidence, we ask survey respondents what they had in mind regarding (i)-(iii) when answering commonly used - life satisfaction, happiness, ladder - and new SWB questions. We find that respondents' self-reports differ from researchers' assumptions and differ across SWB questions and sociodemographic groups. At the same time, simple SWB-question wording tweaks are effective in moving self-reports toward desired interpretations. We outline actionable suggestions for SWB researchers.

Original languageAmerican English
Pages (from-to)2377-2412
Number of pages36
JournalJournal of the European Economic Association
Volume21
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - 1 Dec 2023

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2023 The Author(s). Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of European Economic Association.

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'What do Happiness Data Mean? Theory and Survey Evidence'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this