TY - JOUR
T1 - What works better? 1-year outcomes of an effectiveness trial comparing online, telehealth, and group-based formats of a military parenting program.
AU - Gewirtz, Abigail H.
AU - DeGarmo, David S.
AU - Lee, Susanne
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2024, (American Psychological Association). All Right Reserved.
PY - 2024/3/28
Y1 - 2024/3/28
N2 - Objective: The present study, conducted with a population of military families, examined the comparative effectiveness of three program formats of Adaptive Parenting Tools (ADAPT), a parenting program for families of school-aged children in which a National Guard or Reserve (NG/R) parent had returned from deployment to the post-9/11 conflicts. Despite well-documented need, parenting programs for NG/R families are scarce and often inaccessible. We predicted that both facilitator-delivered conditions (i.e., in-person group; individual telehealth) would result in stronger improvements in observed parenting than assignment to the online self-directed condition. We further proposed a noninferiority hypothesis wherein no significant difference would be detected between telehealth and group conditions. Method: Families (N = 244; 87% Caucasian) were recruited from NG/R units in two midwestern states. Families (with a 5–12-year-old child) were randomized to one of three conditions: in-person multifamily group, individual telehealth, or an online, self-directed condition. The intervention was delivered using the same content across conditions, over 14 weeks (group, telehealth conditions) or 12 modules (online condition); either or both parents could participate. Results: Intent-to-treat analyses supported both hypotheses: families in both in-person group and telehealth conditions showed significant improvements to observed parenting at 1-year postbaseline compared with those assigned to the self-directed online condition. Conclusions: This is the first study to demonstrate that in-person group and telehealth parenting programs are equally effective and that both are superior to a self-directed online program. Limitations include differences between the session lengths in each format, as well as greater attrition in the in-person format. Over the past decade or so, telehealth interventions (i.e., those offered by practitioners using a live video feed) have become common, but few studies have examined whether they are as effective as in-person parenting programs. This study compared telehealth, in-person group, and a self-directed online format of the same parenting program for military families. Families (N = 244) were randomly offered one of the three formats. Analyses of parenting practices at baseline and after 1 year showed that both the telehealth and the in-person group program led to significant improvements in parenting and were superior to the online self-directed program. Telehealth parenting programs appear to be a valuable and helpful way to support parents under stress.
AB - Objective: The present study, conducted with a population of military families, examined the comparative effectiveness of three program formats of Adaptive Parenting Tools (ADAPT), a parenting program for families of school-aged children in which a National Guard or Reserve (NG/R) parent had returned from deployment to the post-9/11 conflicts. Despite well-documented need, parenting programs for NG/R families are scarce and often inaccessible. We predicted that both facilitator-delivered conditions (i.e., in-person group; individual telehealth) would result in stronger improvements in observed parenting than assignment to the online self-directed condition. We further proposed a noninferiority hypothesis wherein no significant difference would be detected between telehealth and group conditions. Method: Families (N = 244; 87% Caucasian) were recruited from NG/R units in two midwestern states. Families (with a 5–12-year-old child) were randomized to one of three conditions: in-person multifamily group, individual telehealth, or an online, self-directed condition. The intervention was delivered using the same content across conditions, over 14 weeks (group, telehealth conditions) or 12 modules (online condition); either or both parents could participate. Results: Intent-to-treat analyses supported both hypotheses: families in both in-person group and telehealth conditions showed significant improvements to observed parenting at 1-year postbaseline compared with those assigned to the self-directed online condition. Conclusions: This is the first study to demonstrate that in-person group and telehealth parenting programs are equally effective and that both are superior to a self-directed online program. Limitations include differences between the session lengths in each format, as well as greater attrition in the in-person format. Over the past decade or so, telehealth interventions (i.e., those offered by practitioners using a live video feed) have become common, but few studies have examined whether they are as effective as in-person parenting programs. This study compared telehealth, in-person group, and a self-directed online format of the same parenting program for military families. Families (N = 244) were randomly offered one of the three formats. Analyses of parenting practices at baseline and after 1 year showed that both the telehealth and the in-person group program led to significant improvements in parenting and were superior to the online self-directed program. Telehealth parenting programs appear to be a valuable and helpful way to support parents under stress.
KW - comparative effectiveness trial
KW - military
KW - parenting
KW - prevention
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85190899332
U2 - 10.1037/ccp0000882
DO - 10.1037/ccp0000882
M3 - ???researchoutput.researchoutputtypes.contributiontojournal.article???
C2 - 38546621
AN - SCOPUS:85190899332
SN - 0022-006X
VL - 92
SP - 310
EP - 319
JO - Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology
JF - Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology
IS - 5
ER -