Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

What’s Wrong with Professional Development for Dialogic Teaching?

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapterpeer-review

Abstract

Changing teaching practice is difficult. This difficulty is especially acute in the case of dialogic teaching, which intensifies the complexity and uncertainty of teaching, often requires shifts in teachers’ beliefs, and increases the demands on teachers’ skills, knowledge, flexibility and judgement. Developing dialogic teaching is therefore a formidable challenge for the individual teacher and can seem an insurmountable task for those seeking to enact dialogic teaching in a sustainable manner and on a wide scale. In this chapter, I discuss the challenges dialogic teaching poses for teachers, schools and systems, and the implications of these challenges for developing and sustaining dialogic teaching. I argue for a socio-cultural, situative, and ecological perspective on teacher learning that focuses on the epistemic and social resources and infrastructures that mediate teacher learning and practice, within and beyond professional development processes.

Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationThe Dialogic Classroom
Subtitle of host publicationInternational Research on Pedagogy, Practice, and Change
PublisherSpringer Nature
Pages247-262
Number of pages16
ISBN (Electronic)9789819554614
ISBN (Print)9789819554607
DOIs
StatePublished - 1 Jan 2026

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2026.

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 9 - Industry, Innovation, and Infrastructure
    SDG 9 Industry, Innovation, and Infrastructure

Keywords

  • Dialogic teaching
  • Ecological approach
  • Professional development
  • Sustainability

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'What’s Wrong with Professional Development for Dialogic Teaching?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this