When the poor give more than the rich: The role of resource evaluability on relative giving

Andrea Pittarello*, Marina Motsenok, Stephan Dickert, Ilana Ritov

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

2 Scopus citations

Abstract

Five experiments examined the role of resource evaluability on giving. We systematically varied participants' resources they and another potential donor received and whether they could donate to a recipient either by themselves or with the other donor. Participants in the relative advantage condition received more resources than the other donor, and those in the relative disadvantage condition received fewer resources than the other donor. The presence of the other donor made participants' resources evaluable and shaped giving: Relatively disadvantaged participants were proportionally more generous than advantaged participants but only when they could evaluate their resources. Neither the mere presence of others nor reputational concerns could explain the results. Exploratory mediation and moderation analyses further showed that relatively disadvantaged participants give proportionally more the higher and the more equal they perceive their status to the advantaged donor. This shows that the generosity of those who have less does depend on how they evaluate their status compared to other donors. Our results provide insights into the question of why and when resource asymmetries between donors result in prosocial giving and can influence fundraising strategies of charitable organizations.

Original languageAmerican English
Article numbere2293
JournalJournal of Behavioral Decision Making
Volume36
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 2023

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2022 The Authors. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Keywords

  • charitable giving
  • evaluability
  • prosocial behavior
  • resource asymmetry
  • status differences

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'When the poor give more than the rich: The role of resource evaluability on relative giving'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this